Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020
95 Imaging
39 Features
39 Overall
39
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 139g - 96 x 59 x 21mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Nikon S4300 and Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S4300 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S4300 was revealed 2 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the S4300 scores vs the 6020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S4300 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Nikon S4300 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S4300 over the Olympus 6020
S4300 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 25 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon S4300
6020 | S4300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S4300 and Olympus 6020
S4300 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S4300 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S4300 and Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the S4300 vs the 6020.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S4300 and 6020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S4300 and 6020.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon S4300 to show more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger S4300 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S4300 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S4300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 13MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 139 grams (0.31 pounds) | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 59 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $119 | $279 |