Clicky

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
26
Overall
33
Nikon Coolpix S5200 front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
32
Features
32
Overall
32

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Nikon S5200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-156mm (F) lens
  • 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Here is a extensive comparison of the Nikon S5200 and Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S5200 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S5200 was unveiled 4 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the S5200 grades versus the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 S5200 SP-565UZ 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2009Fresher by 50 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Nikon S5200

 SP-565UZ S5200 
Manually focus More accurate focus

Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus SP-565UZ

 S5200 SP-565UZ 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S5200 has got physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Take a look at the Nikon S5200 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the S5200 and the SP-565UZ.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S5200 and SP-565UZ is 95 and 72 respectively.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and SP-565UZ.

As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S5200 to give more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher S5200 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S5200
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
30
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
39
manual focus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon S5200 Street photography factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography factors
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Nikon S5200 Sports photography factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography factors
27
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (160 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
32
amazing zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Nikon S5200 Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography advice
68
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (160 CIPA)
does not contain selfie friendly display
52
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S5200
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
41
quite wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
resolution is good (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery pack (160 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
40
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon S5200
Vlogging with Olympus SP-565UZ
32
quite wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone port
24
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S5200 and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Nikon Coolpix S5200Olympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Make Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S5200 Olympus SP-565UZ
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-29 2009-01-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 125 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 143
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-156mm (6.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-4.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 146 gr (0.32 lbs) 413 gr (0.91 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 30
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 68
Other
Battery life 160 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL19 4 x AA
Self timer - Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $130 $400