Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the S5200 (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S5200 was announced 3 years later than the 8010 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S5200 matches up against the 8010 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S5200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S5200 Gallery and Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus 8010
| S5200 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Nikon S5200
| 8010 | S5200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus 8010
| S5200 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S5200 has got physical measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S5200 vs the 8010.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S5200 and 8010 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S5200 and 8010.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon S5200 to give more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger S5200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $600 |