Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S5200 was released 13 months later than the VR-340 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the S5200 matches up against the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus VR-340
| S5200 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon S5200
| VR-340 | S5200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus VR-340
| S5200 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S5200 enjoys physical measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the S5200 vs the VR-340.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and VR-340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S5200 and VR-340.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The more modern S5200 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $130 |