Clicky

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
26
Overall
33
Nikon Coolpix S5200 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Nikon S5200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-156mm (F) lens
  • 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S5200 was released 13 months later than the VR-340 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the S5200 matches up against the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Olympus VR-340

 S5200 VR-340 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2012Fresher by 13 months

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon S5200

 VR-340 S5200 

Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Olympus VR-340

 S5200 VR-340 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Display resolution460k460kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S5200 enjoys physical measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the S5200 vs the VR-340.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S5200 and VR-340 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S5200 and VR-340.

As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The more modern S5200 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S5200
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-340
30
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
34
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Nikon S5200 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Street photography advice
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Nikon S5200 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography information
27
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (160 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Nikon S5200 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography details
68
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery (160 CIPA)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competition in class (125g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S5200
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
41
pretty wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
not so great battery (160 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
43
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S5200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
32
pretty wide (26mm)
fast max aperture (f)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of microphone socket
33
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon S5200 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S5200 and Olympus VR-340
 Nikon Coolpix S5200Olympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S5200 Olympus VR-340
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-01-29 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-156mm (6.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.80 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 146g (0.32 lb) 125g (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL19 LI-50B
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $130 $130