Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Nikon S5200 versus Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S5200 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S5200 was announced 12 months before the WG-4 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the S5200 grades vs the WG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5200 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S5200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Ricoh WG-4
| S5200 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Nikon S5200
| WG-4 | S5200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S5200 and Ricoh WG-4
| S5200 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S5200 comes with external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S5200 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the S5200 and the WG-4.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S5200 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S5200 and WG-4.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more aged S5200 will be behind in sensor tech.
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S5200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $130 | $330 |