Clicky

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3

Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Nikon Coolpix S5300 front
 
Olympus E-3 front
Portability
56
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Key Specs

Nikon S5300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
  • 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2014
Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
  • Announced February 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus E-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S5300 (16MP) and E-3 (10MP) and the S5300 (1/2.3") and E-3 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The S5300 was manufactured 5 years after the E-3 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon S5300 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the S5300 scores vs the E-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus E-3

 S5300 E-3 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014February 2008More modern by 72 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Nikon S5300

 E-3 S5300 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus E-3

 S5300 E-3 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S5300 enjoys external dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus E-3 has dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs).

Analyze the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus E-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the S5300 compared to the E-3.

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S5300 and E-3 is 95 and 56 respectively.

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S5300 and E-3.

Plainly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S5300 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Nikon S5300 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent S5300 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 sensor size comparison

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S5300 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-3 Portrait photography information
41
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
features face detection focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
57
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Nikon S5300 Street photography information
Olympus E-3 Street photography information
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (138 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
70
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Nikon S5300 Sports photography information
Olympus E-3 Sports photography information
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (180 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
58
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather sealing
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Nikon S5300
Travel photography with Olympus E-3
66
lighter than competitors (138g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (180 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
55
weather sealing
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S5300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-3 as a Landscape photography camera
46
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery life (180 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
56
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S5300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-3 as a Vlogging camera
35
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (138g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
18
no video recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus E-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S5300 and Olympus E-3
 Nikon Coolpix S5300Olympus E-3
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S5300 Olympus E-3
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2014-01-07 2008-02-20
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 99 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 26-208mm (8.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.7-6.6 -
Available lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT-LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.58x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 7.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 13.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 138 grams (0.30 lb) 890 grams (1.96 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 56
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 571
Other
Battery life 180 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL19 -
Self timer Yes (10 or 2 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $180 $670