Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the S5300 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S5300 was manufactured 12 months later than the XZ-10 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S5300 grades versus the XZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S5300 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S5300 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S5300 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon S5300
| XZ-10 | S5300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus XZ-10
| S5300 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S5300 offers outer measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the S5300 versus the XZ-10.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5300 and XZ-10 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S5300 and XZ-10.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Nikon S5300 to provide more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent S5300 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 138 gr (0.30 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 240 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $180 | $428 |