Clicky

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Nikon Coolpix S5300 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon S5300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
  • 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S5300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S5300 was launched 2 years after the VR-320 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the S5300 scores vs the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus VR-320

 S5300 VR-320 
ReleasedJanuary 2014July 2011More modern by 31 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S5300

 VR-320 S5300 

Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus VR-320

 S5300 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S5300 has got outside measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the S5300 vs the VR-320.

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S5300 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S5300 and VR-320.

Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S5300 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher S5300 provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S5300 Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
41
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers face detection focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Nikon S5300
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (138g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Nikon S5300 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (180 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Nikon S5300 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
66
lighter than others (138 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery life (180 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
70
lighter than competition (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S5300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
46
you can focus manually
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery life (180 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
42
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon S5300
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
35
really wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (138g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
32
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competition (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S5300 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix S5300Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon Coolpix S5300 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-01-07 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 99 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-208mm (8.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/3.7-6.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT-LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 4.70 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 138g (0.30 lbs) 158g (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL19 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (10 or 2 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $180 $179