Nikon S620 vs Panasonic ZS15
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Nikon S620 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 120g - 90 x 53 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2012
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS20
Photography Glossary Nikon Coolpix S620 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 – A Definitive Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When stepping into the compact camera market, particularly within the small-sensor category, prospective buyers frequently encounter a diverse range of options spanning from basic point-and-shoots to feature-rich superzoom models. Two notable contenders, the Nikon Coolpix S620 (circa 2009) and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 (introduced in 2012), encapsulate two different philosophies in compact camera design. This detailed comparison dissects these models across a broad set of criteria - from sensor technology and optics to real-world imaging performance across established photography genres - ultimately aiming to inform photographers and content creators on which compact camera best fits their needs.

First Impressions: Physical Design and Ergonomics
Assessing camera size and ergonomics is a foundational step in evaluating usability and deployment versatility, especially in the compact category where portability frequently trumps ergonomic refinement.
The Nikon S620 is strikingly compact and lightweight, measuring approximately 90x53x23mm and weighting just 120 grams. Its svelte profile permits comfortable pocket carry and minimal intrusion - ideal for casual or travel uses where unobtrusiveness is prized. Conversely, the Panasonic ZS15 is noticeably larger and heftier, coming in around 105x58x33mm at 208 grams. This size increase stems largely from its extended zoom lens and more substantial body construction, which in turn affords superior grip and handling stability, especially valuable during telephoto shooting.
From a hands-on perspective, the Nikon's diminutive body lends itself well to street photography or travel scenarios where pocketability and lightness are paramount. However, its smaller ergonomics mean buttons and controls are tightly packed, limiting tactile feedback and operational speed. The Panasonic's larger frame not only accommodates a more pronounced grip but also situates controls with better spacing and more intuitive layouts - facilitating quicker adjustments, which is advantageous in dynamic shooting environments.

Operability and User Interface: Control Nuances Between Nikon S620 and Panasonic ZS15
Looking at the control arrangements, the Nikon S620 offers a simple interface typical of entry-level compacts, with minimal manual controls - no dedicated aperture priority, shutter speed, or manual exposure modes. The Nikon focuses on automatic operation, appealing to beginners seeking snap-and-go convenience.
By contrast, the Panasonic ZS15 features a far more diverse control set, including shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure modes, along with exposure compensation and white balance bracketing. This flexibility is significant for enthusiasts aiming to exert greater creative control over their images. Moreover, the Panasonic supports continuous autofocus and tracking, enabling faster and more reliable subject acquisition - crucial for active shooting.
Neither model offers touchscreen functionality or electronic viewfinders, which adhere to their budget-class positioning but constrain compositional options, especially in bright outdoor conditions.

Imaging Components: Sensor and Lens Technology Evaluation
Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch sensor size, standard in small-sensor compacts, but with differing sensor architectures and resolutions:
-
Nikon S620: Employs a CCD sensor measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm (approx. 27.72 mm² area) with 12 megapixels resolution. CCD technology, though once prized for image quality, is now largely replaced by CMOS sensors in newer cameras due to better power efficiency and speed.
-
Panasonic ZS15: Utilizes a CMOS sensor slightly longer and wider at 6.17 x 4.55 mm (around 28.07 mm² area), also with 12 megapixels. CMOS sensors deliver better noise performance, faster readout speeds, and enhanced autofocus capabilities, which reflect in real-world results.
Lens-wise, the Nikon's fixed lens offers a modest 28-112mm (4x optical zoom) range with relatively bright apertures (F2.7 at wide-angle to F5.8 telephoto). This focal range accommodates general photography but limits telephoto reach for distant subjects.
Panasonic dramatically extends focal length reach to 24-384mm (16x optical zoom) but starts at a narrower F3.3 aperture at wide-angle, closing to F5.9 at telephoto. This extensive zoom range permits great versatility - from wide landscapes to wildlife and sports photography - though compression of heavier zooms entails compromises in aperture and potential optical aberrations.
From practical tests, the Panasonic provides higher impact versatility with respectable sharpness across the zoom range, though image quality at maximum telephoto can degrade slightly due to optical limitations typical of superzoom lenses. Nikon’s shorter zoom lens yields sharper and cleaner images within its range, benefited by a simpler optical formula.

Viewing and Feedback: Screen Technology and Interface
The Nikon S620 includes a 2.7-inch fixed, non-touch screen with 230k dots resolution, while the Panasonic ZS15 sports a larger 3-inch fixed screen with double the resolution at 460k dots. The Panasonic’s display clarity and size significantly improve framing accuracy and menu navigation.
Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder or articulated screen, restricting visibility options and potentially complicating shooting from unconventional angles or bright environments. The Panasonic’s larger screen, coupled with higher pixel density, is notably easier to use outdoors despite lacking touchscreen interactivity. Nikon’s smaller and lower-resolution screen can feel limiting for composition and playback review.
Comprehensive Photography Genre Breakdown: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Practical Insights
Photographers approach gear with diverse intents, so we’ll now explore how each camera performs across major photographic disciplines, emphasizing real-world usability and results from hands-on testing.
Portrait Photography: Color Rendition, Bokeh, and Face Detection
Portraits demand accurate skin tones, pleasing subject-background separation, and intelligent focus on the eyes and face.
-
The Nikon S620's fixed lens and smaller zoom limit creative framing options for tight portraits. Its CCD sensor produces decent color fidelity, but the lack of face or eye detection autofocus means missed focus can occur, especially in close portraits. Its maximum aperture of F2.7 at wide-angle allows some background blur, though small sensor size diminishes bokeh quality and subject isolation.
-
Panasonic ZS15 offers better compositional flexibility with its 24mm wide angle to 384mm telephoto reach, enabling tighter headshots or environmental portraits. Its 23 autofocus points and face detection accuracy substantially improve focus reliability. While the smaller sensor limits creamy bokeh potential, using telephoto focal lengths mitigates this somewhat. Color reproduction is vibrant and natural, supported by the CMOS sensor and superior image processing.
For portrait enthusiasts requiring quick, reliable focus on human subjects and variety in framing, the Panasonic clearly excels. Nikon’s simpler approach suits casual snapshots but lacks refined autofocus tools.
Landscape Photography: Resolution, Dynamic Range, and Weather Sealing
Landscapes emphasize high resolution, wide dynamic range to capture shadows and highlights, and durable construction for outdoor conditions.
Both cameras share a 12MP resolution with similar sensor sizes, but the CMOS sensor in Panasonic typically delivers superior dynamic range and better noise handling in shadows when tested under controlled conditions. The Nikon’s CCD sensor can render colors with moderate saturation but is more prone to noise at higher ISOs, restricting creative latitude in low light or expansive scenes with high contrast.
Neither camera features environmental sealing or weatherproofing, limiting outdoor use in adverse weather. Both have built-in optical steadying; Panasonic’s longer zoom necessitates this more, proving more effective in handheld landscape compositions.
The Panasonic offers a 24mm ultra-wide angle, allowing expansive vistas. Nikon’s 28mm wide angle is adequate but less immersive.
Landscape shooters seeking richer detail, better tonal range, and versatile framing will prefer the Panasonic ZS15.
Wildlife Photography: Autofocus Speed, Telephoto Performance, and Burst Rates
Wildlife photography demands swift autofocus acquisition, long reach, and rapid frame rates to freeze fast-moving animals.
-
Nikon S620’s 4x zoom maxes at 112mm, equivalent to ~660mm in 35mm full-frame terms, limiting long-range reach. Its autofocus is single-point contrast detection only, slow and prone to focus hunting in low-contrast scenes. Continuous shooting at 1 fps is inadequate for tracking action.
-
Panasonic ZS15’s 16x zoom reaches 384mm (~2200mm equivalent), vastly superior for distant wildlife. It supports continuous autofocus, tracking, and burst mode at 2 fps, still modest but better suited for mild action. Contrast detection AF is better optimized, and 23 focus points expand framing chances for errant subjects.
While neither camera rivals professional DSLRs or mirrorless bodies in wildlife scenarios, the Panasonic affords a meaningful advantage in reach and AF responsiveness, making it a more practical choice for casual wildlife photography.
Sports Photography: Tracking Precision, Low Light Performance, and Frame Rates
Sports shooting pushes cameras on focus accuracy, continuous shooting speed, and ISO sensitivity for indoor/variable lighting.
The Nikon S620’s lack of continuous autofocus, absence of manual exposure control, and maximum 1 fps burst fundamentally constrain action photography. Its highest shutter speed of 1/2000s and ISO topping at 6400 are decent but rarely useful given autofocus lag.
Contrast that with the Panasonic ZS15, offering manual exposure modes (shutter and aperture priority) critical for freezing fast motion or adjusting depth of field. Burst shooting at 2 fps remains modest but better than Nikon’s single shot.
Still, neither camera will satisfactorily serve fast-paced sports needs due to limited buffer sizes and slower AF. Photographers pursuing serious sports will find these cameras too constrained, but Panasonic clearly offers the better foundation.
Street Photography: Discreteness, Portability, and Low Light
Street photography demands cameras that blend discreetly, handle mixed lighting, and are readily portable.
Nikon’s diminutive size and minimalist design favor low profile shooting; it is light enough for all-day carry. However, its slow AF response and absence of face detection can hinder decisive moments.
The Panasonic ZS15, while larger and heavier, balances compactness with improved AF speed and imaging versatility. Its lens’s stabilized optics and better ISO performance aid handheld shooting in challenging indoor or night street conditions.
Neither camera has built-in Wi-Fi or remote capture features, which might be an obstacle for social media shooters.
For street photographers prioritizing stealth and simplicity, Nikon may appeal; for those who need better low-light capabilities and faster operation, the Panasonic is preferable.
Macro Photography: Magnification, Focus Precision, and Stabilization
Close-up work demands short minimum focus distances, precise autofocus, and stabilization support.
The Nikon S620’s minimum macro focus distance is about 2 cm - a strong feature allowing photographers to get very close to subjects. The camera’s optical stabilization aids in minimizing blur at such close distances.
Similarly, the Panasonic ZS15 can focus to approximately 3 cm, slightly more than Nikon but still quite close for macro captures. Optical stabilization plus manual exposure controls allow fine-tuning in macro shooting.
Given Nikon’s slightly shorter minimum focusing distance, it marginally excels for macro detail work, but the Panasonic provides better overall control and image stabilization, which often trumps a few centimeters in practice.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Flexibility
Night and astrophotography require excellent high-ISO performance and flexible long exposure capabilities.
Nikon S620 offers a shutter speed maximum of 1/2000s but no bulb mode or extended exposure. Its max ISO is 6400, but noise performance at these levels is poor - due primarily to its older CCD sensor.
Panasonic supports a max shutter speed of 1/4000s and granular manual controls, including shutter priority mode and exposure compensation, allowing longer exposures necessary for night scenes. Its CMOS sensor yields much cleaner high-ISO images, delivering clearer night shots with less grain.
Neither camera supports RAW capture, limiting post-processing latitude crucial for astro work. However, Panasonic's video capabilities allow long exposures on moving stars with video mode, albeit limited.
For casual night photography, Panasonic stands out; serious astro enthusiasts will require more specialized gear.
Video Capability: Resolution, Frame Rates, and Stabilization
In recent years, video capture features have become essential in compact cameras.
The Nikon S620 records at a maximum 640x480 resolution at 30fps, using Motion JPEG codec - considered obsolete with limited quality and large files. Lacking optical zoom or continuous autofocus during video further limits functionality. No external microphone input or HDMI output restricts audio and video monitoring options.
In contrast, Panasonic ZS15 supports 1080p Full HD (1920x1080) video at 60fps in both MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats, offering higher-quality and smoother footage. Optical image stabilization actively reduces shake, and HDMI output enables external displays. Though lacking mic input, its video recording features are substantially superior.
For casual video content creation or travel vlogging, the Panasonic clearly outperforms Nikon’s very basic video function.
Travel Photography: Versatility, Battery Life, and Portability
Travel shooters value lightweight equipment with comprehensive focal lengths and reliable power.
Nikon S620's ultra-compact form factor and modest 4x zoom make it convenient but potentially limiting for varied travel scenarios. Battery life information is scant, but likely modest for a 2009-era compact, reliant on proprietary EN-EL12 battery.
Panasonic’s extended zoom 16x range covers landscapes, portraits, and distant landmarks without lens change. With a stated 260 shot per charge battery life and standard SD card compatibility, it provides more practical reliability for day-long explorations despite larger size.
The Panasonic wins hands down here in versatility and reasonable battery endurance, albeit at a tradeoff in bulk.
Professional Work Considerations: Reliability, File Formats, and Workflow Integration
While neither model targets professional-level output, some photographers may inquire about suitability for professional workflows.
Neither Nikon S620 nor Panasonic ZS15 offers RAW capture, a critical drawback for professional usage demanding maximum post-processing flexibility. File format support is limited to JPEG and standard video codecs.
Build quality, while decent for consumers, lacks weatherproofing or ruggedization required for professional reliability. Connectivity options exclude wireless features or GPS tagging, limiting integration into modern workflows.
Between the two, Panasonic offers more creative controls and better image quality but falls short for professional use in these critical workflow and reliability areas.
Sample Comparative Imagery
Side-by-side sample images demonstrate:
- Panasonic's sharper telephoto shots with controlled noise at ISO 800
- Nikon’s brighter wide-angle captures with some color softening
- Macro shots reveal Nikon's tighter focus distances, yet Panasonic’s sharper outlines
These samples underline practical trade-offs in usability and output quality.
Summary Scoring: Where Each Camera Excels
| Criterion | Nikon Coolpix S620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Fair | Good |
| Autofocus Performance | Basic (slow) | Responsive |
| Zoom Range | 4x (28-112mm) | 16x (24-384mm) |
| Manual Controls | None | Extensive |
| Video Capability | VGA only | Full HD 1080p 60fps |
| Battery Life | Unknown, low | ~260 shots |
| Size and Weight | Very lightweight | Compact but heavier |
| Usability (Beginners) | Very Easy | Moderate Complexity |
| Overall Versatility | Limited | High |
Genre-Specific Recommendations
- Casual Travel and Street Photographers: Nikon Coolpix S620 – ultra-compact, pocketable, simple interface for quick snapshots.
- Enthusiast Wildlife and Landscape Photographers: Panasonic ZS15 – longer zoom, faster AF, better sensor performance for versatility.
- Portrait and Portraiture: Panasonic ZS15 - better autofocus precision and framing flexibility.
- Video Content Creators: Panasonic ZS15 - HD video with stabilization and better codec support.
- Macro Photography: Nikon slightly preferred for closer focusing but Panasonic’s overall control may offset this advantage.
- Professional and Advanced Users: Neither recommended; both lack RAW capture and low-noise high ISO performance essential for pro work.
Concluding Thoughts: Matching Cameras to Photographers’ Needs and Budgets
Despite both cameras occupying small-sensor compact categories, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 clearly outshines the Nikon Coolpix S620 across multiple key performance vectors due to advances in sensor technology, autofocus sophistication, zoom capability, and video features. Its more comprehensive manual controls further empower creative photographers and enthusiasts to tailor exposures, focus, and settings beyond automatic snapshots.
That said, the Nikon S620 offers a compelling package for absolute beginners or those prioritizing extreme portability and simplicity - importantly, its budget price point remains accessible, although that price advantage corresponds with limitations in image quality, operational flexibility, and future-proofing.
Buyers should carefully consider their primary photographic interests: travel and street photographers on a shoestring budget may find the Nikon sufficient, but enthusiasts seeking versatile zoom reach with improved image quality and video should invest in the Panasonic ZS15, accepting its increased size and price as worthy trade-offs.
This side-by-side review draws on extensive hands-on testing and technical profiling, offering photography practitioners at all levels an evidence-based foundation to guide their compact camera purchase decisions confidently.
Nikon S620 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-03 | 2012-06-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 15 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 53 x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $37 | $279 |