Clicky

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040

Portability
94
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38
Nikon Coolpix S6200 front
 
Olympus Stylus 7040 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs

Nikon S6200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
  • 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
  • Announced August 2011
Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also Known as mju 7040
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus 7040, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the 7040 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The S6200 was released 20 months later than the 7040 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the S6200 matches up against the 7040 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus 7040

 S6200 7040 
RevealedAugust 2011January 2010More recent by 20 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Nikon S6200

 7040 S6200 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus 7040

 S6200 7040 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 has external dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).

Examine the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus 7040 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the S6200 versus the 7040.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6200 and 7040 is 94 and 95 respectively.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and 7040.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S6200 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent S6200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 sensor size comparison

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S6200 Portrait photography features
Olympus 7040 Portrait photography features
40
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Nikon S6200 Street photography details
Olympus 7040 Street photography details
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Nikon S6200 Sports photography factors
Olympus 7040 Sports photography factors
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
39
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Nikon S6200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus 7040 as a Travel photography camera
70
supports touch focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (250mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
65
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S6200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 7040 as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon S6200
Vlogging with Olympus 7040
31
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
29
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus 7040 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S6200 and Olympus 7040
 Nikon Coolpix S6200Olympus Stylus 7040
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S6200 Olympus Stylus 7040
Also referred to as - mju 7040
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2011-08-24 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed C2 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-250mm (10.0x) 28-196mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 2cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160 grams (0.35 pounds) 144 grams (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 250 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $229 $299