Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus VR-340, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-330 was revealed 6 years prior to the VR-340 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-330 matches up versus the VR-340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 and Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus VR-340
E-330 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-330
VR-340 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 70 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VR-340
E-330 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 offers physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-330 compared to the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d5b8/8d5b80da3a3baef919cdb68b12634cb8e2615f41" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and VR-340 is 65 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16865/16865e2b3004005f87240b618d4566320ced49af" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and VR-340.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will resolve more detail because of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b08d1/b08d19c2cf7bf295a860f601c036c6a7653c74fc" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47c60/47c607603c6fd9c2b613127edd295d0e81cfda44" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus VR-340 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-03-18 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,100 | $130 |