Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S6200 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the TG-850 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S6200 matches up versus the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
S6200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Nikon S6200
TG-850 iHS | S6200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | August 2011 | Newer by 29 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
S6200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 features outside measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the S6200 and the TG-850 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and TG-850 iHS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6200 and TG-850 iHS.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should really consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged S6200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photos | 330 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $229 | $250 |