Clicky

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Nikon Coolpix S6200 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Nikon S6200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
  • 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
  • Launched August 2011
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The S6200 was manufactured 4 months prior to the TG-320 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the S6200 matches up against the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 S6200 TG-320 
Manually focus  More exact focusing
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon S6200

		

		

			
 TG-320 S6200 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 S6200 TG-320 
LaunchedAugust 2011January 2012Same age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen  Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither includes Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6200 features exterior measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the S6200 against the TG-320.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and TG-320.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S6200 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively.
	
			Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Nikon S6200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography advice
40
 has manual focus
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 has face detect autofocus
 no manual mode
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
33
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 includes face detect focusing
 focusing manually not possible
 manual mode not available
 external flash not possible
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
Nikon S6200 Street photography features
Olympus TG-320 Street photography features
63
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 supports touch to focus
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment sealing
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Nikon S6200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
40
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 has tracking focus
 slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 includes tracking focus
 environment sealing
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 bad battery power (150 shots)
 lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Nikon S6200 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
70
 supports touch to focus
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 very long reach (250mm)
 does not have Timelapse function
 does not posses selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 environment sealing
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 pretty wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 bad battery power (150 per charge)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
 Nikon S6200 as a Landscape photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
43
 has manual focus
 really wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
 tiny screen (2.7")
 no manual mode
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
 does not have Timelapse function
39
 pretty wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 environment sealing
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not available
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 bad battery power (150 shots)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6200 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging features
31
 really wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 has face detect autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
 does not posses selfie friendly screen
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
 does not have microphone support
32
 pretty wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detect focusing
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	

		

			
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-320
 Nikon Coolpix S6200Olympus TG-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S6200 Olympus TG-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2011-08-24 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed C2 TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-250mm (10.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.6 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 10cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Screen technology TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance - 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 160g (0.35 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 250 shots 150 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID EN-EL12 LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $229 $0