Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus TG-610, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is fairly similar and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S6200 was manufactured 8 months later than the TG-610 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S6200 matches up versus the TG-610 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Olympus TG-610. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Olympus TG-610
| S6200 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2011 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Nikon S6200
| TG-610 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Olympus TG-610
| S6200 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6200 has outside measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6200 versus Olympus TG-610 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the S6200 against the TG-610.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S6200 and TG-610 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S6200 and TG-610.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon S6200 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer S6200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S6200 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 210 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $229 | $223 |