Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Nikon S6200 and Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe S6200 was revealed 15 months after the HZ35W which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S6200 grades vs the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6200 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Samsung HZ35W
| S6200 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 | June 2010 | Newer by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon S6200
| HZ35W | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Samsung HZ35W
| S6200 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6200 has got physical measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S6200 and Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the S6200 vs the HZ35W.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S6200 and HZ35W.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S6200 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern S6200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternate name | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-08-24 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $229 | $300 |