Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Nikon S6200 versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the S6200 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S6200 was manufactured 19 months after the TL350 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the S6200 scores vs the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Samsung TL350
| S6200 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2011 | February 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Nikon S6200
| TL350 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Samsung TL350
| S6200 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 provides outer dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S6200 versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the S6200 against the TL350.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6200 and TL350 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and TL350.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Nikon S6200 to result in extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer S6200 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung TL350 |
| Alternative name | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $229 | $400 |