Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/292b2/292b2c6c9e9941132d053297f7f0eb80dc6bf8c6" alt="Nikon Coolpix S6200 front Nikon Coolpix S6200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon S6200 versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The S6200 was announced 3 years prior to the WB35F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the S6200 scores vs the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Samsung WB35F
S6200 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon S6200
WB35F | S6200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 28 months |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Samsung WB35F
S6200 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S6200 offers outer dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S6200 versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the S6200 versus the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49515/495152da20e359854535a1bd6925e6c1aa7203ac" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0dd4/f0dd4d3f69b8a98f2dd62a62187d3d6342ab12ca" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and WB35F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photographs but you really should factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older S6200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b87de/b87de113f72f89c2fb7c64023a4df835a0754cdc" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c357/4c3572b0a38481447e90bfba17a9e0d1a79fec9c" alt="Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon S6200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-08-24 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $229 | $130 |