Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
![Nikon Coolpix S630 front Nikon Coolpix S630 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S630/Nikon-S630-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S810c front Nikon Coolpix S810c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S810c/Nikon-S810c-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 140g - 97 x 58 x 26mm
- Released February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched April 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Nikon S630 and Nikon S810c, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Nikon. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the S630 (12MP) and S810c (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The S630 was revealed 6 years before the S810c which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S630 scores vs the S810c when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S630 and Nikon Coolpix S810c. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S630 Gallery and Nikon S810c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S630 over the Nikon S810c
S630 | S810c |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Nikon S630
S810c | S630 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 63 months |
Display dimensions | 3.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S630 and Nikon S810c
S630 | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S630 has got external dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Nikon S810c has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S630 and Nikon S810c in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the S630 against the S810c.
![Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c size comparison Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S630 and S810c is 95 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c top view buttons comparison Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The image below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S630 and S810c.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon S810c to resolve more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged S630 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c sensor size comparison Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S630-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S810c-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S630 vs Nikon S810c Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S630 | Nikon Coolpix S810c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Nikon |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S630 | Nikon Coolpix S810c |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-02-03 | 2014-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-260mm (7.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-L12 | EN-EL23 |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $240 | $350 |