Clicky

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
94
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Nikon Coolpix S6300 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Nikon S6300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
  • Released February 2012
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Released August 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Nikon S6300 and Olympus E-520, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the S6300 (16MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the S6300 (1/2.3") and E-520 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The S6300 was launched 3 years later than the E-520 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon S6300 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S6300 grades vs the E-520 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus E-520

 S6300 E-520 
ReleasedFebruary 2012August 2008More recent by 42 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Nikon S6300

 E-520 S6300 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus E-520

 S6300 E-520 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6300 has outside measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

Check the Nikon S6300 and Olympus E-520 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the S6300 and the E-520.

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S6300 and E-520 is 94 and 68 respectively.

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6300 and E-520.

To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S6300 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Nikon S6300 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger S6300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S6300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon S6300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Nikon S6300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
44
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (6.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good battery power (650 per charge)
comes with phase detect autofocus
slow fps (4.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Nikon S6300 Travel photography details
Olympus E-520 Travel photography details
68
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (250mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
52
good battery power (650 per charge)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S6300 Landscape photography info
Olympus E-520 Landscape photography info
38
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
58
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (650 per charge)
small screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon S6300
Vlogging with Olympus E-520
34
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
9
can't record video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon S6300 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S6300 and Olympus E-520
 Nikon Coolpix S6300Olympus E-520
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S6300 Olympus E-520
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2012-02-01 2008-08-20
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 3
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 25-250mm (10.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.8 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Number of lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 6.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160g (0.35 lb) 552g (1.22 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 548
Other
Battery life 230 photos 650 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID EN-EL12 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $200 $400