Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S6300 was unveiled 3 years before the TG-3 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the S6300 matches up versus the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus TG-3
| S6300 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Nikon S6300
| TG-3 | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 | February 2012 | More modern by 26 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus TG-3
| S6300 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6300 comes with outer measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the S6300 vs the TG-3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S6300 and TG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S6300 and TG-3.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of images although you may want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged S6300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $350 |