Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Announced August 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Panasonic ZR3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 II was announced 5 years later than the ZR3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 II grades vs the ZR3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZR3

 E-M10 II ZR3 
AnnouncedAugust 2015January 2010Fresher by 68 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 ZR3 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3

 E-M10 II ZR3 
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II and the ZR3.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and ZR3 is 82 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and ZR3.

To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZR3 Portrait photography factors
72
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
28
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography advice
Panasonic ZR3 Street photography advice
83
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
features touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography details
Panasonic ZR3 Sports photography details
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
37
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,300s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Panasonic ZR3
73
features touch focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
display is not selfie friendly
65
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZR3
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
37
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Panasonic ZR3
35
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic port
29
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
Alternate name - Lumix DMC-ZX3
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2015-08-25 2010-01-26
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 81 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1300 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 5.30 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lb) 159 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $499 $280