Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c67/34c6734883b80a006f99e64c346b19b37961391d" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 5 years later than the ZR3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 II grades vs the ZR3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZR3
E-M10 II | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 68 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-M10 II
ZR3 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3
E-M10 II | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II and the ZR3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a971a/a971a97c3a93570bdb79fee9a35b2ff3f11617e1" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and ZR3 is 82 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aa65/3aa656dc835545a8da5e481ed03fe54fcf4535c7" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and ZR3.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d5c1/2d5c10d408ffc317ac6ceb5b99918178fafb592b" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/939bd/939bdf95917fa434380f730b8feed1afbc864d23" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $499 | $280 |