Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1
94 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S6300 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the S6300 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S6300 was unveiled 13 months later than the XZ-1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the S6300 matches up vs the XZ-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S6300 and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S6300 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Olympus XZ-1
| S6300 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Nikon S6300
| XZ-1 | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6300 and Olympus XZ-1
| S6300 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S6300 has external measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the S6300 and the XZ-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6300 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6300 and XZ-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S6300 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Nikon S6300 will result in greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern S6300 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S6300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-01 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 320 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $567 |