Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
![Nikon Coolpix S6400 front Nikon Coolpix S6400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400/Nikon-S6400-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900/Sony-T900-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Nikon S6400 and Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the S6400 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The S6400 was revealed 3 years after the T900 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the S6400 grades versus the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6400 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Sony T900
S6400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Nikon S6400
T900 | S6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6400 and Sony T900
S6400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S6400 offers outside measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S6400 and Sony T900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the S6400 versus the T900.
![Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 size comparison Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S6400 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
![Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S6400 and T900.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Nikon S6400 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer S6400 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
![Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S6400-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S6400 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-08-22 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $300 |