Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Introduced February 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Photography Glossary Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S800c (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S800c was introduced 3 years prior to the SH-2 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S800c matches up versus the SH-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S800c and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S800c Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Olympus SH-2
| S800c | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 819k | 460k | Crisper display (+359k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Nikon S800c
| SH-2 | S800c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 | February 2013 | Newer by 25 months |
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Olympus SH-2
| S800c | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S800c features physical measurements of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the S800c versus the SH-2.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S800c and SH-2 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S800c and SH-2.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photographs but you really should take the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged S800c is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S800c vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-02-04 | 2015-03-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 819k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 184 gr (0.41 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 140 shots | 380 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $290 | $399 |