Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4
91 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced April 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Nikon S810c and Olympus TG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S810c (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S810c was released 12 months before the TG-4 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S810c scores against the TG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S810c & Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S810c Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Olympus TG-4
| S810c | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
| Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon S810c
| TG-4 | S810c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 | April 2014 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S810c and Olympus TG-4
| S810c | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S810c has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S810c and Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S810c vs the TG-4.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S810c and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S810c and TG-4.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should really take the age of the cameras into account. The older S810c will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S810c vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S810c | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S810c | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2014-04-10 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.3 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,229k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.60 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 380 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL23 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $379 |