Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S8200 was introduced 19 months later than the 6020 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the S8200 grades versus the 6020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus 6020
| S8200 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 | February 2010 | Fresher by 19 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Clearer screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon S8200
| 6020 | S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus 6020
| S8200 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S8200 features external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S8200 versus Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the S8200 and the 6020.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S8200 and 6020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and 6020.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S8200 to give you more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger S8200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-08-24 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 961 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 gr (0.47 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $329 | $279 |