Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below is a complete review of the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S8200 was introduced 8 months before the TG-1 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the S8200 matches up versus the TG-1 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S8200 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S8200 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
S8200 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 961k | 610k | Clearer display (+351k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Nikon S8200
TG-1 iHS | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | August 2011 | More recent by 8 months |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
S8200 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S8200 enjoys outside dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S8200 vs the TG-1 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S8200 and TG-1 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S8200 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S8200 to offer you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older S8200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S8200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-08-24 | 2012-05-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 961 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $329 | $399 |