Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the S8200 (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S8200 was unveiled 8 months later than the FX78 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the S8200 matches up against the FX78 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S8200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S8200 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Panasonic FX78
| S8200 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2011 | January 2011 | Fresher by 8 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Clearer screen (+731k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Nikon S8200
| FX78 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S8200 and Panasonic FX78
| S8200 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S8200 provides physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Panasonic FX78 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the S8200 vs the FX78.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S8200 and FX78 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S8200 and FX78.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon S8200 to give you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger S8200 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S8200 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-08-24 | 2011-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-350mm (14.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 961k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 213 gr (0.47 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 200 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $210 |