Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000
91 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched July 2011
- Renewed by Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Nikon S9100 and Olympus 8000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9100 (12MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9100 was manufactured 2 years later than the 8000 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the S9100 scores versus the 8000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9100 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S9100 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Olympus 8000
S9100 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Nikon S9100
8000 | S9100 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9100 and Olympus 8000
S9100 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Nikon S9100 has got exterior dimensions of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S9100 and Olympus 8000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the S9100 compared to the 8000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9100 and 8000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The graphic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9100 and 8000.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images however you should always consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more modern S9100 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9100 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 160 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 182 grams (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $329 | $380 |