Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1
91 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
![Nikon Coolpix S9100 front Nikon Coolpix S9100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100/Nikon-S9100-front.jpg)
![Pentax XG-1 front Pentax XG-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-XG-1/Pentax-XG-1-front.jpg)
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced July 2011
- New Model is Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Nikon S9100 versus Pentax XG-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the S9100 (12MP) and XG-1 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The S9100 was introduced 4 years prior to the XG-1 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Nikon S9100 being a Compact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the S9100 grades against the XG-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9100 and Pentax XG-1. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9100 Gallery and Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Pentax XG-1
S9100 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Nikon S9100
XG-1 | S9100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Nikon S9100 and Pentax XG-1
S9100 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9100 has physical dimensions of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Pentax XG-1 has proportions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9100 versus Pentax XG-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the S9100 versus the XG-1.
![Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 size comparison Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Pentax-XG-1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9100 and XG-1 is 91 and 66 respectively.
![Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 top view buttons comparison Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Pentax-XG-1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The pic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9100 and XG-1.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Pentax XG-1 to give greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged S9100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 sensor size comparison Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Pentax-XG-1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9100-vs-Pentax-XG-1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9100 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Pentax XG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Pentax |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Pentax XG-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-07-15 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 lb) | 567g (1.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 240 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LB-060 |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $329 | $599 |