Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched July 2012
- Succeeded the Nikon S9100
- Refreshed by Nikon S9500
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S9300 was brought out 19 months after the TG-310 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S9300 scores vs the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Olympus TG-310
| S9300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 19 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon S9300
| TG-310 | S9300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-310
| S9300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9300 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the S9300 and the TG-310.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9300 and TG-310 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9300 and TG-310.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S9300 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern S9300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Nikon S9300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Portrait photography camera
MP count good (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Nikon S9300
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (215 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Nikon S9300 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (200 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Nikon S9300
Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
lighter than others (215g)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
no Timelapse recording
bad battery power (200 CIPA)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
weather proof
good resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery life (150 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Nikon S9300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery power (200 shots)
no Timelapse recording
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery life (150 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Nikon S9300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (215g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no microphone socket
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-07-16 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.9 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $249 | $0 |