Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Released July 2012
- Superseded the Nikon S9100
- Replacement is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are matching up the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the S9300 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S9300 was released 11 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S9300 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9300 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9300 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| S9300 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Nikon S9300
| TG-2 iHS | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | July 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| S9300 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9300 provides external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the S9300 against the TG-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S9300 and TG-2 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9300 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9300 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older S9300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-07-16 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.9 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $249 | $380 |