Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Later Model is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Nikon S9300 and Samsung WB30F, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S9300 was revealed 5 months before the WB30F and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the S9300 matches up against the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9300 and Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S9300 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Samsung WB30F
| S9300 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Nikon S9300
| WB30F | S9300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Samsung WB30F
| S9300 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2012 | January 2013 | Similar generation | |
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9300 comes with exterior measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9300 and Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the S9300 and the WB30F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9300 and WB30F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specifications. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S9300 and WB30F.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of pictures although you should really consider the release date of the products into consideration.
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9300 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Samsung WB30F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-07-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.9fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $180 |