Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000
92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40


95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9300
- New Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is X-925

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The S9500 was announced 3 years after the FE-4000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S9500 scores versus the FE-4000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Olympus FE-4000. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus FE-4000
S9500 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 43 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Nikon S9500
FE-4000 | S9500 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus FE-4000
S9500 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9500 offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the S9500 versus the FE-4000.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9500 and FE-4000 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The image here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S9500 and FE-4000.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Nikon S9500 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher S9500 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also referred to as | - | X-925 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.5fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 136 grams (0.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $230 | $130 |