Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the MX-1 (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the MX-1 (1/1.7") and WG-2 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe MX-1 was launched 17 months after the WG-2 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the MX-1 grades against the WG-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax MX-1 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax MX-1 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Pentax WG-2
| MX-1 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Pentax MX-1
| WG-2 | MX-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Pentax WG-2
| MX-1 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Pentax MX-1 comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the MX-1 versus the WG-2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the MX-1 and WG-2 is 84 and 91 respectively.
Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the MX-1 and WG-2.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The MX-1 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Pentax WG-2 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer MX-1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Pentax MX-1 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Pentax MX-1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Pentax |
| Model | Pentax MX-1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-07-01 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with AR coating | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 391g (0.86 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 208 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | 260 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-Li-106 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $350 |
