Clicky

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
92
Imaging
41
Features
37
Overall
39
Nikon Coolpix S9500 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-550mm (F) lens
  • 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released January 2013
  • Earlier Model is Nikon S9300
  • Successor is Nikon S9700
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S9500 was manufactured 19 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the S9500 grades against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus VR-320

 S9500 VR-320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013July 2011Fresher by 19 months
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S9500

 VR-320 S9500 

Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320

 S9500 VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9500 has physical measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the S9500 against the VR-320.

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S9500 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S9500 and VR-320.

As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S9500 to show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher S9500 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S9500
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
31
good MP (18 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Nikon S9500
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Nikon S9500 Sports photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography advice
41
great zoom range (25-550mm 22.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (18MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
46
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Nikon S9500 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
71
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
good MP (18MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
very long zoom (550mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than average in class (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S9500 Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
46
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (18 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery power (230 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
41
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9500 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
36
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (205g)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
lighter than average in class (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix S9500Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix S9500 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2013-01-29 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Full resolution 4896 x 3672 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 99 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-550mm (22.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 614 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech OLED monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 7.5 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lbs) 158g (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 LI-42B
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $230 $179