Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9300
- Successor is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S9500 was manufactured 19 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the S9500 grades against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9500 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S9500 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Olympus VR-320
| S9500 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | July 2011 | Fresher by 19 months | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S9500
| VR-320 | S9500 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320
| S9500 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9500 has physical measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9500 and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the S9500 against the VR-320.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S9500 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S9500 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S9500 to show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher S9500 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S9500 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-550mm (22.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | OLED monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $230 | $179 |