Clicky

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
92
Imaging
42
Features
37
Overall
40
Nikon Coolpix S9500 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-550mm (F) lens
  • 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Succeeded the Nikon S9300
  • Replacement is Nikon S9700
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Nikon S9500 and Samsung SL202, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the S9500 (18MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S9500 was manufactured 4 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the S9500 scores versus the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Samsung SL202

 S9500 SL202 
IntroducedJanuary 2013February 2009Fresher by 49 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kSharper display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Nikon S9500

 SL202 S9500 

Common features in the Nikon S9500 and Samsung SL202

 S9500 SL202 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9500 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Nikon S9500 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the S9500 vs the SL202.

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S9500 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S9500 and SL202.

As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon S9500 to give greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger S9500 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S9500 Portrait photography factors
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography factors
31
good resolution (18 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
25
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon S9500 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Nikon S9500 Sports photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Sports photography highlights
42
long zoom range (25-550mm 22.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Nikon S9500 Travel photography information
Samsung SL202 Travel photography information
71
lighter than others in class (205g)
good resolution (18MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (550mm)
great max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly display
57
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S9500 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography highlights
46
decently wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
not so great battery pack (230 shots)
lack of Timelapse recording
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9500 Vlogging information
Samsung SL202 Vlogging information
36
decently wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of microphone support
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
comes with face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon S9500 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S9500 and Samsung SL202
 Nikon Coolpix S9500Samsung SL202
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Samsung
Model type Nikon Coolpix S9500 Samsung SL202
Otherwise known as - PL50
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-01-29 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.16 x 4.62mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4896 x 3672 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 99 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-550mm (22.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 614k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology OLED monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1500 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 7.5 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.60 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lbs) 168g (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 SLB-10A
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $230 $140