Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9500
- Replacement is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Older Model is Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Nikon S9700 and Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S9700 was launched 13 months earlier than the SH-2 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the S9700 matches up against the SH-2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9700 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus SH-2
| S9700 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Nikon S9700
| SH-2 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 | February 2014 | Fresher by 13 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus SH-2
| S9700 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 has got external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9700 and Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the S9700 and the SH-2.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and SH-2 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S9700 and SH-2.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you will want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older S9700 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2015-03-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 11.5fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash modes | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 380 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $399 |