Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Released February 2014
- Older Model is Nikon S9500
- Renewed by Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S9700 was announced 14 months before the TG-4 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S9700 grades vs the TG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9700 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus TG-4
| S9700 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon S9700
| TG-4 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 | February 2014 | Newer by 14 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus TG-4
| S9700 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9700 has outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the S9700 compared to the TG-4.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and TG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9700 and TG-4.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photos but you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged S9700 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-02-07 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 380 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $350 | $379 |