Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Announced February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9500
- Updated by Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Nikon S9700 versus Olympus VR-340, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S9700 was manufactured 2 years after the VR-340 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the S9700 grades versus the VR-340 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus VR-340
| S9700 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 26 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon S9700
| VR-340 | S9700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus VR-340
| S9700 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S9700 features outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Nikon S9700 versus Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S9700 vs the VR-340.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S9700 and VR-340 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The pic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S9700 and VR-340.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of files however you should consider the release date of the products into consideration. The fresher S9700 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $130 |