Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released November 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Pentax and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and CX6 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-3 GPS was launched 21 months after the CX6 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-3 GPS scores versus the CX6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh CX6. The complete galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh CX6
| WG-3 GPS | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | November 2011 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| CX6 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh CX6
| WG-3 GPS | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 GPS comes with physical measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Ricoh CX6 has proportions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS against the CX6.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 GPS and CX6 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 GPS and CX6.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern WG-3 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh CX6 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2011-11-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | 201g (0.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $350 | $595 |