Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9500
- New Model is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Nikon S9700 versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S9700 was launched 3 years after the CX4 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the S9700 matches up versus the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9700 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Ricoh CX4
| S9700 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | August 2010 | More modern by 43 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Nikon S9700
| CX4 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Ricoh CX4
| S9700 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9700 features outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S9700 versus Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the S9700 against the CX4.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and CX4 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S9700 and CX4.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Nikon S9700 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer S9700 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-02-07 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $350 | $211 |