Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
![Nikon Coolpix S9700 front Nikon Coolpix S9700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S9700/Nikon-S9700-front.jpg)
![Samsung DV300F front Samsung DV300F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-DV300F/Samsung-DV300F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Previous Model is Nikon S9500
- Newer Model is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The S9700 was released 2 years later than the DV300F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the S9700 scores versus the DV300F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Samsung DV300F. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Samsung DV300F
S9700 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Nikon S9700
DV300F | S9700 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Samsung DV300F
S9700 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 features outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the S9700 and the DV300F.
![Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9700-vs-Samsung-DV300F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and DV300F is 90 and 96 respectively.
![Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9700-vs-Samsung-DV300F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S9700 and DV300F.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of photographs though you should really take the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent S9700 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
![Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9700-vs-Samsung-DV300F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S9700-vs-Samsung-DV300F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung DV300F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-01-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.10 m |
Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $350 | $200 |