Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Nikon S9900 and Olympus FE-5020, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The S9900 was introduced 5 years after the FE-5020 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S9900 matches up against the FE-5020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus FE-5020. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus FE-5020
S9900 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Nikon S9900
FE-5020 | S9900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus FE-5020
S9900 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9900 enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9900 and Olympus FE-5020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the S9900 versus the FE-5020.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S9900 and FE-5020 is 88 and 95 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and FE-5020.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon S9900 to produce greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern S9900 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus FE-5020 |
Also called | - | X-935 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $300 | $160 |