Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Nikon S9900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The S9900 was introduced 5 years after the SP-800 UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S9900 grades against the SP-800 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
S9900 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 62 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Nikon S9900
SP-800 UZ | S9900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
S9900 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9900 has got outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the S9900 compared to the SP-800 UZ.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and SP-800 UZ is 88 and 69 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and SP-800 UZ.
Clearly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9900 to show greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more modern S9900 provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 12s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 455g (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $270 |