Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
93 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus TG-610, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S9900 was announced 4 years later than the TG-610 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the S9900 scores versus the TG-610 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus TG-610
| S9900 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 50 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Nikon S9900
| TG-610 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus TG-610
| S9900 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 enjoys external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus TG-610 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the S9900 versus the TG-610.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and TG-610 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S9900 and TG-610.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to result in greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S9900 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 210 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $223 |