Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9700
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus TG-3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is fairly close and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9900 was revealed 11 months after the TG-3 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the S9900 scores versus the TG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus TG-3
| S9900 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | March 2014 | More modern by 11 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Nikon S9900
| TG-3 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus TG-3
| S9900 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 has got outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the S9900 vs the TG-3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9900 and TG-3 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and TG-3.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you will want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The fresher S9900 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Nikon S9900 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography features
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Nikon S9900 Street photography information
Olympus TG-3 Street photography information
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (289 grams)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Nikon S9900 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography features
long zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery power (330 shots)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Nikon S9900 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography information
lighter than average (289g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
quite wide (25mm)
long reach (750mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
good battery power (330 shots)
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Nikon S9900 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography highlights
quite wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
reasonably wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
good battery power (330 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Nikon S9900 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (289g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
does not have external microphone jack
reasonably wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 330 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $350 |