Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VG-160, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S9900 was launched 3 years after the VG-160 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the S9900 matches up against the VG-160 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus VG-160
| S9900 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 38 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon S9900
| VG-160 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus VG-160
| S9900 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 features physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the S9900 and the VG-160.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and VG-160 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and VG-160.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S9900 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger S9900 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 165 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $90 |