Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Nikon S9900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S9900 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9900 was manufactured 2 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the S9900 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S9900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | December 2012 | More modern by 27 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S9900
| XZ-2 iHS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S9900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9900 comes with exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Nikon S9900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the S9900 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and XZ-2 iHS is 88 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S9900 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S9900 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Nikon S9900 will offer you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern S9900 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $450 |