Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Nikon S9900 and Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S9900 was brought out 6 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the S9900 scores against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Samsung SL102
| S9900 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 75 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Nikon S9900
| SL102 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Samsung SL102
| S9900 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 has got outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9900 and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S9900 versus the SL102.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S9900 and SL102.
Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S9900 to offer you greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent S9900 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $130 |